I&R TALKING POINTS
Select the ones pertinent to your audience. 

"... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers 
from the Consent of the Governed, ..."
   
The DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, 1776

“All political power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded 
on their authority, and instituted for their benefit.”
  
THE
TEXAS CONSTITUTION, Article 1, Section 2  

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1.  I&R is the people's check on government.   In Texas, we don’t have it.

2.  Sometimes it is claimed that if Texans had the Initiative and Referendum (I&R) it would be used to hurt minorities.  This objection is not a valid because:  
      A.  The U.S. Constitution prohibits laws that discriminate against minorities;  
      B.  Proposed initiatives will be scrutinized by the Attorney-General's office for constitutionality,   
      C.  
A bad law can always be reversed by another Initiative --- or stayed by the Court.
      D.  If a proposed law doesn't inherently benefit voters, it probably won't pass.  In 100-year of initiative activity in 24 states, only 1,902 initiatives have been placed on the ballot.  And the voters approved only 787 of these proposals.
Citizens are far more cautious than Legislators.  Texas Legislators impose 1,500 new laws on Texans EVERY session --- in just 140 days.

3.  Bogus arguments against I&R rights for Texans are common.  They include:
   A.  Representative government in Texas would end.  NOT SO, the TX legislature would still pass over 99% of the laws.  I&R is simply our constitutional right of petition enumerated in the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights. 
   B.  Special Interests would gain advantage.  NO.  The Special Interests would lose their monopoly on legislative activity thru their lobbyists.  Why do you think the Special Interests are so uniformly opposed to I&R?
    C.  Texas would be flooded with elections.   NOT TRUE.  Qualifying initiatives would appear on the ballot only at the next state-wide general election in November of an even-numbered year. 
    D.  The ballot would be flooded with propositions.  Unlikely, but it's a non-problem.  See The Dallas Morning News, 3/17/9, editorial page under INITIATIVE REFORM.  The largest example of ballot flooding in California was 1990.  28 propositions were on the ballot.  Politicians placed 19 of them there.   Citizens initiated only 9.  Voters knew what to do.  They voted for 6 and rejected the remaining 22.

    E.  Prop 13 ruined California, etc.  This is a frequently heard claim is false.  To be brief, 3 studies cited in The Austin American-Statesman editorial page, "Proposition 13 defended," (10/10/94), concluded: Prop 13 did not cause the California "mess."   A recession and a withdrawal of government defense contracts caused the drastic shortfall in revenue.

4.  The competitive, free-market era of critical oversight of government by the media is practically non-existent.  I&R powers are needed to offset this governmental and Special Interests' distortion of issues and conditions --- and to propose appropriate reforms.

5.  John Talley, Longview, TX, states: "There are those occasions under our form of government when the interests of the represented --- and the interests of the representatives are at odds.  The Initiative is the means by which the represented assure their interests ultimately prevail."   The Trans-Texas Corridor land grab, the toll road menace, and our unconstitutional Public School Finance Bill are examples of the legislature being "at odds" with the citizenry.   I&R powers are needed to "assure" that our "interests ultimately prevail."

6.  INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM IS NOT ABOUT POLITICS.  IT'S ABOUT FREEDOM:
    A.  Freedom from an abusive government:  Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize-winning economist states: "I believe our present predicament exists because we have gradually developed governmental institutions in which the people effectively have no voice."   THRU I&R, TEXANS WOULD POSSESS THAT VOICE!
    B.  Freedom to exercise our constitutional right:  Jerry Patterson (Texas Land Commissioner and former State Senator) says, "The first amendment to the U.S. Constitution enumerates the right of the people "to petition the government for redress of grievances.' . . .The legislature should pass I&R and enact this right guaranteed by both the U.S. and the Texas constitutions."
    C.  Freedom from government corruption:  President Woodrow Wilson in 1913 stated: "We are cleaning house, and in order to clean house the one thing we need is a good broom.  Initiative and referendum are good brooms."

7.  Two separate polls show that the majority of Texans favor I&R:  The National Federation of Independent Business poll --- 62% favored I&R with 21% opposed.   A Rasmussen Research random sample of 500 adult Texans in 1998 found that Texans want initiative rights by a margin of 74% to 12%.

8.  New York Public Interest Research Group Research studied voter turnout during the years 1976 to 1996.  Voter turnout was 6% higher in I&R states.

9.  Prof. John Matsusaka at University of Southern California studied government spending over a 30-year period.  Spending in I&R states was 4% lower than in non-I&R states. 

10.  Initiative and Referendum was in the platform of the Republican Party of Texas (RPT) from 1979 to 1996.  It had the support of people such as William Clements, Walter Mengden, Waggoner Carr, Dick Armey, George W. Bush, Tom Craddick and Jerry Patterson.  Furthermore, 2 separate advisory referendums on the Republican Party primary ballots showed rank and file Republicans to favor I&R by margins of 7 to 1 and 5 to 1.  In the mid-90s, as the Republican Party came into control of all branches of the Texas State government, the platform plank favoring I&R was replaced with one opposing I&R --- despite the fact that Republican Party members wanted I & R by overwhelming margins.   

11.  I&R is a tool of reform available to citizens when elected officials disappoint, as they regularly do.  Taxes and regulation are on the rise.  Government growth has accelerated.  The remedy is to implement a tool (I&R) by which people can actually check government.    

12.  The recent state laws creating the Trans-Texas Corridor, and allowing local officials in several urban areas to quickly convert free roads to toll roads, and build new ones, with minimal citizen participation is an excellent indicator of why I & R is needed – to correct the effects of bad government decisions.  The last session showed voters the weaknesses in a process that leaves all power in the hands of elected and appointed officials. 

13.  In sum...I&R offers Texans the only tool powerful enough to roll back government peacefully.  Its risks are so small as to be inconsequential.

 “Men by their makeup are naturally divided into two camps:  those who fear and distrust the people and wish to draw all powers from them into the hands of higher classes; and those who identify themselves with the people, have confidence in them, cherish and consider them the safest and most honest, if not always the wisest repository of the public interest.....These two camps exist in every country, and wherever men are free to think, speak, and write, they will identify themselves.”  
— 
Thomas Jefferson

For a discussion of opposition arguments